Circuit Theory/Example70

 The latest reviewed version was checked on 29 March 2013. There are template/file changes awaiting review.

original circuit

The series components can be lumped together .. which simplifies the circuit a bit.

Node AnalysisEdit

Node analysis

File:Example70mupad.png
mupad and matlab code for all the work below
{\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbb {V} _{s1}-\mathbb {V} _{a}}{5}}-\mathbb {V} _{a}-{\frac {\mathbb {V} _{a}+\mathbb {V} _{s2}}{j{\sqrt {3}}}}=0}
{\displaystyle \mathbb {V} _{a}=-0.42063+j0.065966}

Mesh AnalysisEdit

Mesh analysis

{\displaystyle i_{1}-i_{2}-V_{s1}+5*i_{1}=0}
{\displaystyle i_{2}j{\sqrt {3}}-V_{s2}+i_{2}-i_{1}=0}
{\displaystyle i_{3}=i_{1}-i_{2}}

Solving

{\displaystyle i_{3}=-0.42063+j.065966}

Which is the same as the voltage through the 1 ohm resistor.

Thevenin voltageEdit

Thevenin voltage requires opening the load

Make ground the negative side of {\displaystyle V_{s2}}, then:

{\displaystyle V_{th}=V_{A}-V_{B}}
{\displaystyle V_{th}=i*j{\sqrt {3}}-V_{s2}}
{\displaystyle V_{th}={\frac {V_{s1}+V_{s2}}{5+j{\sqrt {3}}}}*j{\sqrt {3}}-V_{s2}}

Solving

{\displaystyle V_{th}=-0.747977-j0.5492}

Norton CurrentEdit

{\displaystyle i_{n}=i_{1}-i_{2}={\frac {V_{s1}}{5}}-{\frac {V_{s2}}{j{\sqrt {3}}}}}
{\displaystyle i_{n}=-0.4667+j0.3220}

Thevenin/Norton ImpedanceEdit

Example70impedance.png

short voltage sources, open current sources, remove load and find impedance where the load was attached

{\displaystyle Z_{th}={\frac {1}{{\frac {1}{5}}+{\frac {1}{j{\sqrt {3}}}}}}=0.537+j1.5465}

check

{\displaystyle Z_{th}={\frac {V_{th}}{I_{n}}}=0.537+j1.5465}

yes! they match

Evaluate Thevenin Equivalent CircuitEdit

Example70theveninEquivalent.png

Going to find current through the resistor and compare with mesh current

{\displaystyle i={\frac {V_{th}}{Z_{th}+1}}=-0.42063+j0.06599}

yes! they match

Find average power transfer with Load that maximizesEdit

{\displaystyle Z_{th}+Z_{L}=0.537*2}
{\displaystyle P_{avg}={\frac {Re(V_{th})^{2}}{Z_{th}+Z_{L}}}={\frac {\sqrt {0.747977^{2}+0.5492^{2}}}{2*0.537}}=0.8037watts}

SimulationEdit

Example70simulation2.png

The circuit was simulated. A way was found to enter equations into the voltage supply parameters which improves accuracy:

To compare with the results above, need to translate the current and voltage through the resistor into the time domain.

PeriodEdit

Period looks right about 6 seconds ... should be:

{\displaystyle T={\frac {1}{f}}={\frac {2*\pi }{w}}=2*\pi =6.2832}

CurrentEdit

Current through 1 ohm resistor, once moved into the time domain (from the above numbers) is:

{\displaystyle i(t)=0.4258*cos(t+171^{\circ })}

From the mesh analysis, the current's through both sources were computed:

{\displaystyle i_{s1}=0.1192*cos(t+9.72^{\circ })}

The magnitudes are accurate, they are almost π out of phase which is can be seen on the simulation.

VoltageEdit

The voltage is the same as the current through a 1 ohm resistor:

{\displaystyle v(t)=0.4258*cos(t+171^{\circ })}

The voltage of the first (left) source is:

{\displaystyle V_{s1}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{6}}cos(t+{\frac {pi}{4}})=0.2357*cos(t+45^{\circ })}

The magnitudes match. The voltage through the source peaks before the current because the first source sees the inductor.

The voltage through the resistor should peak about 171 - 45 = 126° before the source ... which it appears to do.



This article uses material from the Wikipedia article
 Metasyntactic variable, which is released under the 
Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
.